Integration · Webhooks

Webhook vs Polling — A Field Guide

Webhooks push, polling pulls. The choice is usually framed as either/or, but the most reliable integrations use webhooks for speed and polling as a safety net.

John Kihiu12 min read

When you need to know that something changed in another system, you either ask repeatedly (polling) or get told (webhooks). Each has a genuine place, and the common mistake is treating it as a permanent religious choice rather than picking per the constraints — or, better, combining them.

The trade-offs

WebhooksPolling
LatencyNear-real-timeBounded by poll interval
LoadWork only when events happenConstant, mostly empty checks
ReliabilityDelivery can be missedYou control retries; nothing is 'missed'
SetupPublic endpoint, signing, dedupeA loop and a cursor
ControlProvider decides what and whenYou decide when and what to fetch

When webhooks win

Webhooks are the right default when latency matters and events are relatively infrequent — a payment succeeded, a build finished, a document was signed. You do work only when something actually happens, instead of asking "anything new?" thousands of times to catch a handful of changes. For real-time reactions at scale, polling simply cannot compete on efficiency.

When polling wins

Polling wins when you cannot expose a public endpoint, when the provider offers no webhooks, when you want full control over timing and back-pressure, or when changes are so frequent that a poll returns useful batches every time. It is also far simpler — a cursor and a loop, with no signature verification, no dedupe, no public attack surface — which for a low-stakes internal sync is a real advantage.

The resilient pattern is both

Webhooks give you speed but can drop an event; polling is slow but never misses. Serious integrations use webhooks for low-latency reaction and a periodic reconciliation poll as the backstop that catches anything the webhook missed. You get real-time behaviour and a guarantee of eventual consistency — the strengths of each covering the other's weakness.

Choose polling for simplicity, control, or when webhooks are not on offer; choose webhooks for low-latency, efficient reaction to sparse events. And when correctness genuinely matters, stop choosing: run webhooks for speed and a reconciliation poll for completeness, so a missed delivery becomes a slightly delayed update instead of lost data.

John Kihiu
Acumatica ERP Developer · Laravel Engineer

Independent software engineer in Nairobi specialising in Acumatica customisations, Laravel backends, and tax fiscalisation integrations across East and Southern Africa.